The Interpersonal Protection Order
Interpersonal Protection Order (IPO) and False Allegations
The custodian who had custody of the child at the time falsely reported that the mother had set a bush in front of the residence on fire. This claim was made without any evidence, such as a police report, ambulance report, or fire department report.
Court's Response
The mother informed the Court that she was at the Courthouse on the specific date mentioned, but this information was not considered. Despite this, Judge Kathy Stein signed the Interpersonal Protection Order (IPO), which was set to remain in effect for two years.
Misunderstanding of the IPO
The relative who had custody believed that the IPO would act as a gag order. However, the IPO simply meant that the mother was not allowed to go within 500 feet of the petitioner (the relative).
During this period, the mother also filed a formal complaint against the presiding judge, Kathy Stein, with the Judicial Misconduct Committee. This was around the same time the judge had already been previously suspended twice.
Judge suspended again for actions in child custody case (yahoo.com)
Judge Kathy Stein Suspended (wuky.org)
Fayette County judge suspended for a week for misconduct (wkyt.com)
Family court judge suspended without pay for 7 days | AP News
At this stage, the family member who had temporary custody of the child ceased visitation, based on the belief that the mother had made allegations of sexual abuse involving children in the family. However, these allegations were not made by the mother, nor was there any incident involving the burning of a bush in front of her residence. She did not provide any proof or any report(s). Despite this, an Interpersonal Protective Order (IPO) was granted. The custodian claimed she was being stalked as well.